Stereotactic ablative brachytherapy versus percutaneous microwave ablation as salvage treatments for lung oligometastasis from colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The treatment for lung oligometastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) remains challenging. This retrospective study aimed to compare the local tumor control, survival and procedure-related complications in CRC patients undergoing low-dose rate stereotactic ablative brachytherapy (L-SABT) versus percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for lung oligometastasis. METHODS: Patients between November 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed in the entire cohort as well as by stratified analysis based on the minimal ablation margin (MAM) around the tumor. RESULTS: The final analysis included 122 patients: 74 and 48 in the brachytherapy and MWA groups, respectively, with a median follow-up of 30.5 and 35.3 months. The 1- and 3-year LTPFS rate was 54.1% and 40.5% in the brachytherapy group versus 58.3% and 41.7% in the MWA group (P = 0.524 and 0.889, respectively). The 1- and 3-year OS rate was 75.7% and 48.6% versus 75.0% and 50.0% (P = 0.775 and 0.918, respectively). Neither LTPFS nor OS differed significantly between the patients with MAM of 5-10 mm versus > 10 mm. Pulmonary complication rate did not differ in the overall analysis, but was significantly higher in the MWA group in the subgroup analysis that only included patients with lesion within 10 mm from the key structures (P = 0.005). The increased complications was primarily bronchopleural fistula. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the caveats associated with radioisotope use in L-SABT, MWA is generally preferable. In patients with lesion within 10 mm from the key pulmonary structures, however, L-SABT could be considered as an alternative due to lower risk of bronchopleural fistula.

Risk prediction of intraoperative pain in percutaneous microwave ablation of lung tumors under CT guidance.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of intraoperative pain in microwave ablation of lung tumors (MWALT) on local efficacy and establish the pain risk prediction model. METHODS: It was a retrospectively study. Consecutive patients with MWALT from September 2017 to December 2020 were divided into mild and severe pain groups. Local efficacy was evaluated by comparing technical success, technical effectiveness, and local progression-free survival (LPFS) in two groups. All cases were randomly allocated into training and validation cohorts at a ratio of 7:3. A nomogram model was established using predictors identified by logistics regression in training dataset. The calibration curves, C-statistic, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the accuracy, ability, and clinical value of the nomogram. RESULTS: A total of 263 patients (mild pain group: n = 126; severe pain group: n = 137) were included in the study. Technical success rate and technical effectiveness rate were 100% and 99.2% in the mild pain group and 98.5% and 97.8% in the severe pain group. LPFS rates at 12 and 24 months were 97.6% and 87.6% in the mild pain group and 91.9% and 79.3% in the severe pain group (p = 0.034; HR: 1.90). The nomogram was established based on three predictors: depth of nodule, puncture depth, and multi-antenna. The prediction ability and accuracy were verified by C-statistic and calibration curve. DCA curve suggested the proposed prediction model was clinically useful. CONCLUSIONS: Severe intraoperative pain in MWALT reduced the local efficacy. An established prediction model could accurately predict severe pain and assist physicians in choosing a suitable anesthesia type. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study firstly provides a prediction model for the risk of severe intraoperative pain in MWALT. Physicians can choose a suitable anesthesia type based on pain risk, in order to improve patients' tolerance as well as local efficacy of MWALT. KEY POINTS: • The severe intraoperative pain in MWALT reduced the local efficacy. • Predictors of severe intraoperative pain in MWALT were the depth of nodule, puncture depth, and multi-antenna. • The prediction model established in this study can accurately predict the risk of severe pain in MWALT and assist physicians in choosing a suitable anesthesia type.

Preoperative computed tomographic-guided percutaneous coil localization of pulmonary nodules: 184 Cases in Single-center.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of computed tomographic (CT)-guided coil localization before video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-four consecutive patients with 200 pulmonary nodules who underwent CT-guided percutaneous coil localization before thoracoscopic surgery were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Success rate for localization, complication rates, CT findings, and pathological results of the lesions, as well as the data related to surgery were all recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: All 184 patients with 200 lesions completed localization and resection. The success rate of the coil localization on lesion baseline was 99.0% (198/200) and 98.9% (182/184) on patient baseline. The number of wedge resection, segmental resection, and lobectomy were 179 (89.5%), 19 (9.5%), and 2 (1.0%), respectively. The malignancy rates in a lesion-based analysis were 83.5% (91.1% in ground-glass nodules, 91.4% in part-solid nodules, and 37.9% in solid nodules). No serious complications occurred in all localization procedures. CONCLUSION: Preoperative CT-guided percutaneous coil localization is a safe and effective method to facilitate high success rates for both wedge and segmental resection for peripheral pulmonary nodules.

Clinical effect of bronchial arterial infusion chemotherapy and CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads in patients with stage II-IV lung cancer: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: CalliSpheres are drug-eluting beads used for tumor artery embolization, with clinical benefits in a number of cancer types. The aim of the study was to examine the clinical benefits and complications of patients with stage II-IV lung cancer treated with CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads for embolization versus conventional vascular interventional treatment. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study conducted from August 2018 to May 2019. The patients were grouped according to traditional bronchial arterial infusion chemotherapy (infusion group) or bronchial arterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads loaded with adriamycin (CallisSphere group). Short-term effects, serum tumor markers, and adverse reactions during follow-up were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 60 participants enrolled into the study with 30 in each group including 54 men and six women, 42-78 years of age. In the CalliSphere group, compared with the infusion group, the disease control rate was 93.3% versus 73.3% (P = 0.080) and the objective remission rate (ORR) was 86.7% versus 60.0% (P = 0.039); the three- and six-month progression-free survival (PFS) and six-month overall survival (OS) were better in the CalliSphere group (three-month PFS: 96.7% vs. 73.3%, P = 0.026; six-month PFS: 87.5% vs. 57.1%, P = 0.045; six-month OS: 87.5% vs. 52.7%, P = 0.024); after treatment, the tumor markers in the CalliSphere group were lower (CEA: P < 0.001; CYFRA21-1: P = 0.014). There were no differences in adverse reactions between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical effect of bronchial arterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads on lung cancer is probably significant and could improve the short-term response, PFS, and OS in patients with stage IIIV lung cancer, without increasing severe adverse reactions. KEY POINTS: SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: The clinical effect of bronchial arterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads on lung cancer is probably significant and could improve the short-term response, PFS, and OS in patients with stage II-IV lung cancer, without increasing severe adverse reactions. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: The ORR, PFS, OS was better in the CalliSphere group than that of infusion group; CEA and CYFRA21-1 were significant lower in CalliSphere group.